Constitutional bench revokes Justice Mansoor’s directives in contempt of court case.

The Supreme Court’s Constitutional Bench has revoked the January 13 and 16 orders issued by Justice Mansoor Ali Shah, which had initiated the contempt of court case against Additional Registrar Judicial Nazar Abbas.

The decision came during a hearing on the Customs Regulatory Duty case, where Attorney General Mansoor Usman Awan informed the bench of the government’s plan to challenge the orders. He stated that the federal government would file a review petition focusing on the contempt case, specifically contesting the bench’s formation and related decisions. This development marks a key moment in the ongoing legal proceedings.

Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar questioned the enforceability of Justice Mansoor’s orders, asking, “Can we proceed with this order in place?” Justice Jamal Mandokhel highlighted broader concerns regarding judicial independence, emphasizing the importance of safeguarding the Supreme Court’s integrity and public trust in the judiciary. He remarked, “Issues of judicial independence are critical, and nothing should harm our institution.”

Justice Aminuddin Khan raised additional concerns, questioning why the hearing, initially scheduled for January 27, was moved to an earlier date. He also noted that a judge from the three-member bench had been removed from the proceedings, raising doubts about the bench’s consistency.

Tensions arose during exchanges between Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Barrister Salahuddin, with heated remarks over the case’s progress. Justice Mazhar criticized the perceived lack of seriousness, prompting Barrister Salahuddin to defend his position, stating he would respond firmly if his reputation was questioned. Justice Aminuddin intervened, urging restraint and focus on the case’s merits.

After deliberation, the Constitutional Bench withdrew the January 13 and 16 orders by Justice Mansoor Ali Shah and directed that the record of the contempt case involving Nazar Abbas be attached to the ongoing customs duty case. The hearing was adjourned indefinitely.

Share this post